Happy news first,
Surgeon refuses to treat patient that smokes. According to the article, Mr. Smith has a 15 smoke a day habit and complains of cold legs that pain him. Surgeon tells him to kick his habit first because that is possibly what began his problem. Otherwise the surgery could end up with Mr. Smith minus some legs if it doesn't work- the leg equivilant of an angioplasty. The patient is furious that he is "being bullied" into stopping his habit. Some people are really dense.
Now for the things that make me mad-
Kellogg getting rid of trans fats by introducing genetically modified soy oil early next year. As if soy products didn't twist me up enough, they are messing around with the genes of it all as well. Haven't these people heard of techniques like grafting and pollen transfer?
Truthfully, there is a problem with research on things like food/flavor additives (MSG included), alternative diets, and genetically modified food products. That would be that most people have to rely on the internet for their supplimental materials. Unfortunately, there are many people that in turn write the articles with limited sources of information that could be either false, misleading, or incomplete. I'm not saying all articles are suspect and bunk, but how do we find out how much good and bad are in things like soy? How do we know if a vegan diet is truly healthy?
Another glaring problem is that the
FDA allows for a certain amount of fudging-
Provides exceptions for spices, flavorings, and colors not required to be certified under specified provisions.
-1990 Food Labeling says basically if you want to hide your secret sauce's kick, you put it as natural flavorings or organic spices and the FDA just wants to make sure that is is natural and organic. They don't care about what exactly the 'flavorings and spices' are. What does a manufacturer need to hide that they put cumin, tumeric, and oregano in their ketchup?
Much research on food products are back pocket affairs. Research is an expensive proposition, and a lot of funding can end up coming from unexpected sources. For example- a soy farmer co-op sponsoring the research on a 'boca-burger-look-a-like' product being good for cancer prevention and reduce the rate of cell oxidation. This can be done if there is significant research that a chemical in the product has been linked to possibly reducing the risk of a commonly researched disease/condition in the USA. But they have to also say the FDA didn't say that it does.
One of the most important things I learned from my science and math classes is that it can be very easy to mislead with the right kind of data or data-less layout. How can consumers make appropriate decisions on what they eat when data is skewed in the manufacturers' favor? The FDA has its guidelines, yes, but many times I have found them to be full of loopholes. There is no regulation on things like herbal supplements. A lot of diet food is regulated simply that it doesn't make false claims or contains snake oil so to speak. If it has a new ingredient in it that the FDA hasn't seen in some form before, it must have enough documentation to show that it won't pose a health risk. Meanwhile, it can have empty calories, enough sugar to rot teeth, and make you crave to eat more of it. Try picking up a 'health food bar' and write down any six of the ingredients you find. Look them up on sites that don't claim their benefit or lack therof. Look up how they are made. That alone should clue you in to the nature of how healthy a product is.
Source 1Source 2Source 3Soy lechitin -
Lecithin is the gummy material contained in crude vegetable oils and removed by degumming. Soybeans are by far the most important source of commercial lecithin and lecithin is the most important by-product of the soy oil processing industry.
You can find this in almost every kind of food product. Chcolate chips, cakes, snack bars, cookies. All the sources say the same thing, after they extract the soy oil from the edamame (soybeans) they press more out of the leftover matter into cakes and treat it. What is expelled is a tan or dark brown fluid or gummy mass that is treated into a useable texture. I don't think it would be far off to say that it is what is left over in the pipes after they are done pressing for oils. Amazing, two products out of one vegetable. Ugh.
I take with a grain of salt the addition of calling articles that don't promote a specific brand of product and show both sides of an arguement scientifically as
not being labeling. Skewed facts and lobbying anyone?
is displayed or presented, or is displayed or presented with other such items on the same subject matter, so as to present a balanced view of the available scientific information on a dietary supplement
I just don't think there is enough being done to check on the throughness and integretify of product research. The sources of funding is sometimes compromising to the purpose and can promote long term heath risks. Why else do we have such high profile cases on things like Vioxx and Viagra? Cover ups, incomplete research, improper use, improper labeling- spanning years. The FDA isn't all to blame, its a large awkward body. Manufacturers, patients, pharmacists, doctors all make their choices. But we trust in a common law system to be the safety net for us.
On Macs- I disagree with this reasoning "Macs don't crash". So help me, when I was going to school to learn Maya, they yanked out the Sun computers, solid little linux machines to put a Mac lab in. We could do networking, we could use Shake, and Photoshop. They did not like Maya. The two months in that lab was hell with how the computers would randomly crash. Let's not speak of attempts to render.
She gets a CoverGirl contract - OMG SHE HAS NO BREASTS!America's Next Top Model Winner Nicole Linkletter. Poor poor girl. She could go around topless and no one would notice when she would go to the men's restroom.